jump to navigation

The Museum of Questionable Medical Devices December 4, 2006

Posted by Dr. Bertalan Meskó in Health, Humor, Invention, Medicine, science.
trackback

Medical history has produced some results that make us rethink our whole profession. Anyway, we must admit it, sometimes they can point to the future. But just sometimes…

The Museum of Questionable Medical Devices has more than 250 quack medical devices in the collection:

In the early 1990′s, the American Medical Association indexed it’s Historical Health Fraud & Alternative Medicine Collection. At that time, the AMA generously donated duplicates from its collection, some 100,000 items, to the Museum of Questionable Medical Devices. Additionally, we have our own collection which includes items generously donated by individuals over the years.

I’d like to present two devices, you can see and read about the others here. The first one is the Foot Operated Breast Enlarger Pump:

In 1976, four million women in the United States each spent $9.95 on this device which caused bruising…and nothing more. The user created a vacuum by pumping the pedal with the foot. The device consists of a pump, clear plastic tubing and three cups – all in large sizes.

The second one is the McGregor Rejuvenator from 1932:

In a patent filed in 1932, Mr. M.E. Montrude Jr. of Seattle, Washington claimed that by the use of magnetism, radio waves, infra-red and ultra-violet rays he could reverse the aging process. The patient was rolled for treatment on a cart into a machine with only the head outside the chamber. The chamber does look a bit like an iron lung but the similarity ends there.

benlargerrej-rear3


Digg!

Comments»

1. Darmok - December 4, 2006

What’s the point of reversing aging if my brain and face will remain old? I want my money back!

2. ncurse - December 4, 2006

:) Have you seen the other devices on their homepage?

3. Darmok - December 6, 2006

Yes, they are quite amusing. But then again, there is nothing stopping people from developing patents on these devices. One doesn’t have to have medical training or demonstrate clinical efficacy to obtain a patent—one just needs some imagination!

4. eliza - December 12, 2009

Thanks for sharing the information…….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 134 other followers