Comments on: Wikipedia Scandal: Secret Mailing List

By: Tim Vickers

Tim Vickers — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:30:53 +0000

Thanks for your vote of confidence, but there are a lot of excellent science editors on Wikipedia, I can’t take any particular credit.

Tim

By: frodo441

frodo441 — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:21:25 +0000

you know knowledge and information is not just a homogenized mass media alone on the trail of “nosferotsu”…this is the endeavor of artists poets historians and laymen alike…in a cashmere sense of applicable [livingdry] of scholars and scientists…but not alone for Etruscan fables of a fashion statement and boetian ethnocentricity…

By: frodo441

frodo441 — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:13:39 +0000

…let me tell you about these people…many as specialized American technological labor…are profusely adamant about preserving what they have…and not just for the totality of the experience for the fashion whole of popular application of wares that are specific skills accumulated…and expatiated in some manner…techno guru’s abound in cyberspace equally…the preservation of applicable skills is desperately endangered when the totality of experience is truncated to the front end mechanism of a semantical whole.

By: frodo441

frodo441 — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:07:44 +0000

…does some daemon on one of the network modes threaten you because he has to substantiate the qualifying factor of the information proposed?

By: frodo441

frodo441 — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:05:41 +0000

…not at all…but the abuse of popular accumulated datum on much of the totality of garnard and learned knowledge cannot hinge on the excitability of well intentioned self appointed pundits…it would be nice yes if every professor and learned scientist would get on line for a popular application of Known and Unknown knowledge…but in the scholastic endeavor…precedence and reference has to be made…why should a learned council summarily volunteer all the extent of their knowledge when their livelihood depends on people showing up on campus for an education? …If forward thinking and mass application are to be garnerd in society…shouldn’t knowledgable people with real qualifications that historically are vehemently preserve…not somehow utilize the medium to make a few bucks?

By: Circeus

Circeus — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:25:02 +0000

Actually, if harsh, the writing is pretty accurate on most of the basic facts (if you disregard ignorance about Wikipedia terminology).

By: d

Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:19:43 +0000

The register is well-know as a source of poorly written sensationalist articles, so I’m going to wait untill a better news source sums it up.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:18:29 +0000

The register is well-know as a source of poorly written sensationalist articles, so I’m going to wait untill a better news source sums it up.