<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/</link>
	<description>A doctor&#039;s journey in genetics PhD and medicine through web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Sangudi</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-47904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Sangudi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-47904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These both seem forward-looking platforms for collaborating with several obvious benefits - with more experienced physicians sharing their knowledge with those less experienced and in return learning new approaches and techniques that more recently trained physicians may be more familiar with.

Considering this, I am curious if people would have expected a higher amount of traction or enrollment for both Sermo and Ozmosis at this time?

And considering the trust factor, do the benefits still outweigh any risks in open anonymous or identified collaboration and information sharing?

I am sure this valuable collaboration can has much room to grow. Consider counterparty sites, like one for lawyers, and you might agree. At the one for lawyers, situations are presented and free discussion and advice is given, and options for more in-depth legal counsel are also made. It seems a win-win, where the whole community gets better informed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These both seem forward-looking platforms for collaborating with several obvious benefits &#8211; with more experienced physicians sharing their knowledge with those less experienced and in return learning new approaches and techniques that more recently trained physicians may be more familiar with.</p>
<p>Considering this, I am curious if people would have expected a higher amount of traction or enrollment for both Sermo and Ozmosis at this time?</p>
<p>And considering the trust factor, do the benefits still outweigh any risks in open anonymous or identified collaboration and information sharing?</p>
<p>I am sure this valuable collaboration can has much room to grow. Consider counterparty sites, like one for lawyers, and you might agree. At the one for lawyers, situations are presented and free discussion and advice is given, and options for more in-depth legal counsel are also made. It seems a win-win, where the whole community gets better informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers « ScienceRoll &#124; Think Networks</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-47544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers « ScienceRoll &#124; Think Networks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-47544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers « ScienceRoll.   Posted by Noshir Contractor / Filed under:Uncategorized [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers « ScienceRoll.   Posted by Noshir Contractor / Filed under:Uncategorized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jessup</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-39299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Jessup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-39299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a member of both, I&#039;ve found that ozmosis is more &quot;engaged&quot;, in the sense that there are a lot less empty discussions.  Post a question in the ozmosis clinical or journal area, you will elicit several responses.  Sermo, I wonder if anyone is there sometimes.  Still, I am fans of both, and I would suggest all physicians sign up for both of them and explore...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of both, I&#8217;ve found that ozmosis is more &#8220;engaged&#8221;, in the sense that there are a lot less empty discussions.  Post a question in the ozmosis clinical or journal area, you will elicit several responses.  Sermo, I wonder if anyone is there sometimes.  Still, I am fans of both, and I would suggest all physicians sign up for both of them and explore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From 2008 to 2009 &#171; ScienceRoll</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-38216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[From 2008 to 2009 &#171; ScienceRoll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-38216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ozmosis vs Sermo: Answers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-38143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-38143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They also tell podiatric surgeons to shove it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also tell podiatric surgeons to shove it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medical products for shoulder</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-35100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[medical products for shoulder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-35100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sermo.com, the most famous physician-only community site. The founders were really nice to answer myhttp://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/REMINDER: ORLive Presents: Delta XtendTM Reverse Shoulder System New Design Reverses Anatomy of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sermo.com, the most famous physician-only community site. The founders were really nice to answer myhttp://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/REMINDER: ORLive Presents: Delta XtendTM Reverse Shoulder System New Design Reverses Anatomy of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCG</title>
		<link>http://scienceroll.com/2008/04/11/ozmosis-vs-sermo-answers/#comment-34981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceroll.wordpress.com/?p=1801#comment-34981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sermo is only open to physicians (MD or DO) currently practicing in the United States. This is not very useful for medical students.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sermo is only open to physicians (MD or DO) currently practicing in the United States. This is not very useful for medical students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

