jump to navigation

The Evolution of Writing November 19, 2008

Posted by Dr. Bertalan Meskó in twitter, Web 2.0.
trackback

Robert Scoble left a message on Friendfeed yesterday:

“I invested a lot of time this year in FriendFeed and Twitter instead of my blog. Was that the right decision?”
I replied to him:
No question about that. In the past, websites were static compared to blogs. Now blogs are static compared to microblogging services.

This image shows something like that:

evolutionwriting

A Very Brief History of Micro-Media. Credit: David Armano.

(Hat tip: Labnol.org)

Comments»

1. unphased - November 20, 2008

twitter seems great as a rapid information-disseminating tool, but how many of your tweets will still be making an impact a year from now?

2. kirsti - November 21, 2008

So here’s my question….what’s the most informative?? What makes the greatest contribution in this already crowded 2.0 sphere. If someone re-tweets – isn’t that just noise? Or is it interaction?

Just wondering…. love your work Berci!

3. Matches Malone - December 23, 2008

I have to go with the bird analogy again. It really depends on how much whuffie one has, actually.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 133 other followers